scientific Chinese He Jiankui He said Monday conducting IVF with altered genes that led to resistant to the AIDS virus twins on & # 39 announcement that prompted his suspension from the university where he works and ethical criticism of the action is considered to be "dangerous" and "irresponsible" .
Researcher training at Stanford in the United States and operates a specialized laboratory in Shenzhen genome said to have used the technique CRISPR-cas9Called "genetic scissors" that allows you to remove and replace the unwanted parts of the genome, as the error will be corrected in the computer.
Infants, called "Lula" and "Nano" born IVF modified prior to implantation in the uterus of the mother to the unborn child.
genetically modified DNA it can be used for disease prevention, but this practice with the & # 39 is problematic because the genetic changes will be inherited by future generations.
South University of Science and Technology (SUST) Shenzhen University has already announced that suspended I Jiankui and to investigate whether it was an experiment with Mr. Elas ethical and scientific rules, as reported MIT Technology Review.
The university said that I stopped receiving their salaries from February and found that fertilization with modified genes represented a "violation of ethics academy and its rules."
The announcement of this medical experiment made on the eve of a conference of world experts in the genome of Hong Kong in which Chinese researcher has to submit its findings in detail.
However, after the criticism is not sure his speech at a & # 39; Genetics Congress.
This self-proclaimed medical experiment has not been verified independently. Chinese team Sun published his results in a scientific journal.
A "very problematic" experiment
After a & # 39; waking, many Chinese scholars and institutions have criticized the experiment. One hundred of his Chinese colleagues have published a joint statement criticizing the experiment and asked that the legislation on IVF varies.
In addition, international researchers have criticized the announcement was made through a video on YouTube
"In proclaiming these results in a video on YouTube & # 39 is very problematic scientific practice," complained Nicholas Evans, a professor of philosophy at the University of Massachusetts Lowell, United States of America, working on issues of bioethics.
"It is moving away management processes, which are based on many scholars, such as the progress of the review," he added, interrogated AFP.
Found not to be advertised, this is a matter of "Sur & # 39; serious ethical problems," said Sarah Chan, University of EdinburghThat refer to the Science Media Center.
"By making such statements, apparently deliberately seek a maximum of disputes (…) is irresponsible," he added.
I do not Jiankui immediately answer questions AFP.
With information from AFP