Facebook has been the aim of probes of various governments since news broke about a year ago, which allowed the personal data of tens of millions of users who will work with policy advice Cambridge Analytica.
Earlier this month, he has come under fire for being too long to make a video in real time to the shooting in New Zealand, and allows it to be distributed via the Internet. Millions of users have also had personal information obtained with the help of recent violations.
Over the past year, lawmakers have brought a more thorough check of the company and its huge impact, asking its leaders – including Zuckerberg – to testify before Congress to explain the spread of misinformation, statements and manipulation of the election on the platform.
In his post, Zuckerberg offers "regulation would establish a baseline for what is prohibited, and requires companies to establish systems for storing said long ago dangerous content to a minimum." Tech industry that Article 230 of the Law on the integrity of communications is of vital essential for its ability to handle open platforms.
Provision exempts the company from that responsible for user-generated content. Zuckerberg claims that Facebook does not want to be the arbiter of truth, and decided to self-regulate through the hiring of more than 10,000 content reviewers to break the content of his life.
Facebook built a content scanning system, which over the years to add a rule based on the reaction to changes in the behavior of users and the public discontent after the incident, such as a mass shooting in New Zealand. If the users of the website or computer systems report problematic posts, they sent one of the 15,000 companies moderators around the world who are allowed to take the content down, only if he gives away.
In a post on Saturday (Sunday AEDT), Zuckerberg said Facebook would like to common standards for verification of political actors, referring to the practice of advertisers deployed in many countries, identity checks before buying political advertising. He also proposed to update the laws to include a "shared political issues", in addition to the candidature for and election.
"Every day we decide that it is harmful, it is political advertising, and how to prevent sophisticated cyber attacks," he said. "But if we were starting from scratch, we would not ask us to make these decisions alone."
The billionaire said that it would be good for the web when other countries have established regulations such as General Protection regulation data from the European Union as a common basis.
Facebook has an incentive to play an active role in the debate around the regulation of production of these companies. the rapid growth of the company's revenues and billions of dollars in profits fueled by collecting points numerous data about their customers, and solutions that are readily available to advertisers.
Instagram extra income
Progressive groups urged the Federal Trade Commission to share Facebook and separated Instagram, WhatsApp Messenger, and in their company. In January, Zuckerberg announced that Facebook plans to integrate tools chat on WhatsApp, Instagram and Facebook Messenger services, making Disintegration difficult to perform if the services are more closely related to each other.
This step is also increased concern about the transparency for consumers and, as a collection of data Facebook works.
Specific rules "have to defend your right to choose how your information is used – at the time, allowing the company to use the information for security purposes and to provide the service," he said. "It should not require data to be stored locally, which would make it more vulnerable to unwarranted access."
There must also be rules to ensure data portability, protects the information if it is moving between services, he said.
Zuckerberg this year worked in the frame more critical Facebook problem as broader issues for the Internet as a whole, and not only affect his campaign.
His willingness to accept regulation may adopt more complex questions from Facebook hand, or, at least, to give companies more time to solve them.