The President will be the big winner, but if the approach used by the media, is concentrated in a very short time, and ignores the question of the content discussed. That is, the increase to the same extent that we are still the prevalence of such vulgarity that is becoming a hallmark of type of policy emanating from La Moneda. The President returned to the box alone, with the action effects that dominate and reducing the role of support groups. Giving the reasons for the opposition to take the initiative. It shows a truncated management control. No, he did not win.
Who said that won in bilateral meetings held in La Moneda was President Sebastian Pinera, as the measure of success is that the answer to his call. I do not agree with this view.
Piñera think will be the biggest winner, only if the approach used by the media, is concentrated in a very short time, and ignores the question of the content discussed. That is, the increase to the same extent that we are still the prevalence of such vulgarity that is becoming a hallmark of type of policy emanating from La Moneda.
This episode opposition assessing the quality we have, as the only thing that would have allowed Piñera was the only beneficiary would be the complete uselessness of what a dialogue. I do not think, however, that the presidents of opposition party released this opportunity by not offering concrete results.
Leaching and four meetings with the leaders of the parties, it is clear that no one was present because he would like to see with the & # 39; to appear in photos with Pinera. The fact that they wanted to get a real dialogue and at the end of this stage of the way, giving in progress check.
20 minutes of the meeting to give a report, an hour bilateral meetings allow an exchange of views and discussions have undoubtedly learn specific agreements. And the proof that it was possible to get to this point, has been the president of the party was an ordinary talked to explain what it is, you allow the president to evaluate, decide and take the initiative.
From what we know so far, the most worth mentioning is the great harmony, which is visible in the background perspective, the first four presidents presented to the President.
It is impossible not to note the differences in the style and attention to each set of the party leader. There were more defensive and claiming ownership of a better deal (Alvaro Elizalde) or go to the bench itself, to reach an agreement as an active instance (Carlos Maldonado) relationship. Others have adopted a more proactive approach and seek to promote a more flexible mechanisms (Heraldo Muñoz) or waiting for changes in behavior by arranging "some" suggestions (Fuad Chahin).
There is no doubt that these different relations will be on display at the time, and it refers to the joint work developed by the Parliament, at both the caucuses and technical equipment. In particular, this is true in matters of taxation and social security.
This episode will also assess the quality of government we have. The problem is that Piñera all along with the presidents of opposition parties must reach consensus later with his own coalition. And everyone will ask, why in such a strange situation.
In the end, the ruling parties have caucuses, ministers in the daily life of the Parliament and the views of the opposition fully known to them. The idea to make a step towards improving the environment deteriorated from the starting point, it may be less susceptible to the format, but no one can stand back and accept what's done is done.
The government has the right to initiate negotiations as the most convenient to you. If the president invites each party chairman, and opens a new start in relations with the opposition, any method & # 39; is valid. But what's going on after this first step already has a lot of open variable. Further steps depend on, we can make the first assessment. In fact, there are two options available.
Option of good intentions with & # 39 is: Piñera met with each party chairman, called for the support of its flagship projects are approved, it is then that he meets the conditions that allow the viability of their petition, the president thinks, and leaves open the possibility of getting a quick response.
This is followed by a meeting with a political committee, call the meetings and the definition of the term to get the result. If all goes well, always on the basis of good intentions, the time was used to evaluate the conditions set by leaders of the opposition, taking some of his views, call for tables Chambers and Presidency frame, the call for the ratification of agreements and a happy ending. At least as happy as you can be in negotiations.
Option is not so good intentions is as follows: the President convened a meeting with the opposition, not too clear idea about what is going to offer, ask for support and to disclose competing offers, Piñera makes no commitment and nothing of & # 39 is to establish contact, inform its political committee and the ruling benches, a large group of respondents believe that the demands of the opposition to the & # 39 are excessive. But things get confused. Government parties make a pretty obvious question: why Piñera question about the chances of an agreement, if all of these present conditions were clear from the beginning ?. It is easy to ask more difficult to answer.
In this embodiment, the executive responsible opposition, which calls, as a gesture of goodwill, the idea of lawmaking previously approved, in general, promising that their views will be considered. The opposition is demanding another question is the most obvious: why round of consultations, when it ends, offering the same thing that has happened, because before these meetings ?. Again, the question is easy to answer difficult. You won Piñera in this episode? No. And the reason is that the background is clearly the type of work the first line of the ruling party, which does not allow full coherence.
It has a liaison group operating under the wing of the president aligned with the work of others, and that surprises with other initiatives on the image rather than its consequences. It has a political team, consisting of one member and two assistants, who takes over completely the situation and the conflict. First, I had to replace Piñera in the negotiations and did not. There is an economic team that says a lot, prepare documents, ahead of the possible solutions, and overcome when making a decision.
Pinera returned alone the penalty area. With the action of which effects dominates. Reducing the role of support groups. Giving the reasons for the opposition to take the initiative. It shows a truncated management control. No, he did not win.